The topics covered during the course of the last couple of Finance 4335 class meetings (portfolio and capital market theory) rank among the most important finance topics; after all, the scientific foundations for these topics won Nobel prizes for Markowitz (portfolio theory) and Sharpe (capital market theory). The following outline pretty much summarizes what we covered in class on Tuesday, March 13 and Thursday, March 15:
 Portfolio Theory (covered on Tuesday, March 13)

 Meanvariance efficiency
 Portfolio MeanVariance calculations
 Minimum variance portfolio (n = 2 case)
 Efficient frontier (n = 2 case under various correlation assumptions)

 Capital Market Theory (covered on Thursday, March 15)
 Efficient frontiers with multiple number (“large” n) of risky assets (aka the “general” case)
 Portfolio allocation under the general case
 degree of risk aversion/risk tolerance determines how steeply sloped indifference curves are
 indifference curves for investors with high (low) degrees of risk tolerance (aversion) are less steeply sloped than indifference curves than for investors with low (high) degrees of risk tolerance (aversion)).
 Optimal portfolios (i.e., portfolios that maximize expected utility) occur at points of tangency between indifference curves and efficient frontier.
 Introduction of a riskfree asset simplifies the portfolio selection problem since the efficient frontier is now a straight line rather than an ellipse in space. The same selection principle holds as in the previous point (point 2); i.e., investors determine optimal portfolios by identifying the tangency between their indifference curves and the efficient frontier. The point of tangency occurs on the capital market line (CML) where the Sharpe ratio is maximized; everyone chooses some combination of the riskfree asset and the market portfolio, and risk tolerance determines whether the point of tangency involves either a lending (low risk tolerance) or borrowing (high risk tolerance) allocation strategy.
 The security market line (SML), aka the CAPM, is deduced by arbitrage arguments. Specifically, it must be the case that all riskreturn tradeoffs (as measured by the ratio of “excess” return () from investing in a risky rather than riskfree asset, divided by the risk taken on by the investor () are the same. If not, then there will be excess demand for investments with more favorable riskreturn tradeoffs and excess supply for investments with less favorable riskreturn tradeoffs). “Equilibrium” occurs when markets clear; i.e., when there is neither excess demand or supply, which is characterized by riskreturn ratios being the same for all possible investments. When this occurs, then the CAPM obtains: .